Tell it the decision.It interviews the room.
Last Word asks the questions a researcher would ask, follows up on what each person actually says, and reports back whether the evidence supports the call you were about to make.
What areas of the Forum can be improved?
The schedule was too intense. 8am to 7pm with almost no breaks, and other meetings scheduled into the breaks that did exist.
Who do you think the current schedule makes it hardest for to participate?
People from neurodiverse backgrounds. Without real breaks we have to step out and miss parts of the meeting.
You expected people to want a longer forum. 11 of 43 want to keep 3 days; 7 want more. The intensity complaint is an accessibility issue: add real breaks, not a day.
The difference
A survey collects answers.
An interview finds out why.
How it works
It interviews you first.
Then it interviews them.
Twenty minutes of setup conversation about the decision you're facing and what you expect to hear. Everything after that is built from it.
The brief
You talk, it listens. What gets decided, who reads the results, and your honest bet on what people will say. It writes the questions from that, not from a template.
The second question
Someone says the schedule was too packed. A form moves on. Last Word asks who the schedule makes it hardest for, and learns it's the neurodiverse attendees who need real breaks. That answer changed a program.
"Would you prefer longer Q&A, or smaller breakout discussions?"
The verdict
The report opens by answering your question and telling you whether your bet held. Every count is people, not responses. Every quoted follow-up is the one that was actually asked.
Everything included
Built for the team in the room.
Not survey experts.
On-demand insights
AI synthesizes responses into clear answers and prioritized recommendations
The Bottom Line
Keep 3 days. Fix recordings and food. Don't extend.
Post session recordings within 72 hours
7 of 43 raised it; 16 said conflicts are fine if they can catch up
What AI Follow-ups Uncovered
Before: "The schedule was too intense"
After: "Without real breaks, neurodiverse attendees have to step out and miss parts of the meeting"
Type it or say it
Most people type. Some talk. Both read like a conversation, and nobody can paste a chatbot into a microphone.
Share in seconds
Send a link or display a QR code. Meet people wherever they are — no app downloads.
Export for stakeholders
Beautiful PDF reports ready to share, or PPTX for your next planning meeting.
"We received six times more feedback than our previous survey. The insights report saved us weeks of analysis and the follow-up questions uncovered key themes for us to address in future forums."
Greg Schmidt
Director Emeritus, Solar System Exploration Research Virtual Institute (SSERVI)
2026 forum, 43 scientists
The director's question going in: would the community prefer a longer forum with fewer parallel sessions? The report's first line coming out: keep it three days. Eleven people said extending it would dilute the thing they love about it; seven wanted more time. The parallel sessions weren't the problem. Recordings that took two weeks to post were. One follow-up question the survey wasn't originally written to ask moved the fix from “add a day” to “post the videos faster.”
The comparison
A real study used to cost $30K and six weeks.
Now it costs a scoping call.
The difference between data and decisions.
For rooms where every voice counts
Twenty to five hundred people, one decision riding on what they say.
Post-Event Intelligence
For cities, institutions, and organizations making real decisions
- We run the engagement end to end
- Every respondent interviewed, typed or spoken
- Decision-grade report in days, not months
- Defensible evidence for stakeholders
Ready to hear what people actually think?
The room has opinions.
Make sure you hear them.
Bring the decision. We bring the interviews, the follow-ups, and a report that says whether you were right.
Free for up to 10 respondents per event. No credit card required.
